Insights
Personal Value Proposition
August 8, 2024
The top of your CV is the most expensive space you own. Every reader sees it. Most readers see little else — the first screen decides whether there is a second.
So it is worth asking what most people put there. Usually one of two things: contact details a recruiter could find in three seconds anyway, or a career summary. The summary is the better answer, but look at how they are typically written:
“Results-driven senior leader with 20+ years of international experience in cross-functional roles, with a proven track record of delivering strategic initiatives in matrixed environments.”
Read one, read them all. It is grammatically flawless and says nothing. A hiring manager scanning their fortieth CV of the morning cannot remember it ten seconds later, because there is nothing to remember. It could describe a hundred thousand people, and that is precisely the problem — in a market like Basel’s, it does.
The fix starts with one question: what is your CV actually for?
There are two honest answers. Either it is a chronological record of your career, or it is how you sell yourself to a potential employer. Most CVs are written as the first and hoped to perform as the second. They cannot. A record is neutral by design. Selling requires a claim.
From summary to proposition
A Personal Value Proposition does what a summary refuses to do: it makes a specific, falsifiable claim about the value you create, for whom, in what situations.
The difference is easiest to see side by side.
Summary: “Experienced commercial leader with strong stakeholder management skills and a background in life sciences.”
Proposition: “I build commercial teams in markets where the science is ahead of the regulations — three launches in environments where the playbook didn’t exist yet.”
The first describes a category of person. The second describes one person, makes a claim a reader can test against the evidence below it and — crucially — tells the hiring manager what problem you are for. Hiring managers do not buy backgrounds. They buy solutions to the specific situation keeping them up at night, and a proposition lets them recognise their situation in you within five seconds.
What a proposition is made of
Three components, none optional.
**The claim.** One sentence on the value you create. Not your seniority, not your years, not your sector — the thing that happens to a business because you are in it. If you struggle to find it, look at the pattern in your career rather than the titles: what do the situations you were brought into have in common? That pattern is the claim. (I have written separately about this at career level — the thesis that turns a list of roles into a case. The proposition is that thesis, compressed for the top of a page.)
**The evidence.** Two or three specifics that make the claim credible. Numbers where they exist, named situations where they don’t. “Took a CHF 40m product through a market where reimbursement rules changed mid-launch” beats “strong record of navigating complexity” in every conversation you will ever have.
**The relevance.** A proposition is written for a reader, and senior hiring has few readers. The version you send a biotech scale-up should not be identical to the version a corporate sees. The claim stays constant. The evidence selected to support it shifts. This is twenty minutes of work per application, and it is the twenty minutes that decides whether the rest of the document gets read.
The discomfort is the point
Most senior professionals resist this, and the resistance is worth naming. A claim feels exposed. A summary feels safe — it cannot be wrong because it asserts nothing. Particularly in Switzerland, where understatement is close to a professional virtue, writing “here is the specific value I create” feels like boasting.
It is the opposite. Vagueness forces the reader to work out your value themselves, and busy readers decline the work. A clear proposition is a courtesy: it tells them in five seconds whether to keep reading. The modest-sounding summary is the truly arrogant document — it assumes the reader will dig for what you would not state.
The good news is the same as ever: nothing needs inventing. The claim is sitting in the career you already had, usually visible to everyone except you. The work is extraction — and once it is extracted, it does not just fix the top of your CV. It becomes the sentence your network repeats when your name comes up in a room you are not in.
That sentence is worth more than the rest of the document combined. If you can list every role you’ve held but the top of your CV still sounds like everyone else’s, the claim is in there. Let’s talk it over.
Contiue reading